VAST vs ADHD — And Why It Matters for the Neurodiversity Change Foundation(NCF)

VAST vs ADHD — Why Language Matters for Systems Change

I’ve had some great conversations this week about labelling — who defines us, what language actually reflects lived experience, and how reframing can unlock systems change. We’ve explored and invented new acronyms that better articulate our reality. There is more to come on this. But one term already carries broad resonance: VAST — Variable Attention StimulusTrait.

Most people know ADHD. Far fewer know VAST — a term coined by Dr. Edward Hallowell to describe the same cluster of attentional differences without the lens ofdeficit, disorder, or pathology. VAST isn’t about replacing anyone’s diagnosis. It’s about expanding the conversation, shifting how systems understand us, and naming what many of us already know: the issue is rarely the person — it’s the environment.

VAST is a systems-change lever.

Why ADHD Language Falls Short

“ADHD” is a medicalized label rooted in deficit framing: attention deficit, executive functioning disorder. It signals that the problem lives inside the individual. But for many neurodivergent adults, the struggle is not internal. The real barriers come from context:

  • Workplaces built for linear thinkers

  • Healthcare systems that misinterpret communication or pace

  • Accommodation processes that involve excessive burdens and harm

  • Policies focused on impairment instead of diversity

The ADHD label often leads to:

  • Misunderstanding

  • Underestimation

  • Under-accommodation

  • Blame instead of redesign

These outcomes are not neutral. They produce harm, exclusion, discrimination, and lost opportunity. When deficit framing is embedded in the name used to describe our difference, how can we realistically expect equity?

What VAST Actually Reframes

VAST reframes attentional differences as a normal part of human variation — neither good nor bad, neither pathology nor personal failure, and not something to correct or cure. It recognizes:

  • Dynamic attention

  • Stimulus variability

  • Strength-based patterns

  • Intensity, hyperfocus, creativity, nonlinear problem-solving

  • Sensitivity to context, meaning, environment and justice

This language shifts the question from: “What’s wrong with this person?” to “What environment/support/relationship/structure/setting do they need to thrive — and why isn’t the system providing it?” And importantly: The goal isn’t to replace ADHD or deny anyone’s diagnosis or supports. It’s to widen the frame so that lived experience, dignity, and complexity are no longer collapsed into deficit.

Read More…

Previous
Previous

International Human Rights Day: Adult Neurodivergent Rights Are Human Rights

Next
Next

The Hidden Cost of Asking for Workplace Accommodation